Updated: 23-8-2024

To establish criteria for trails that promote sustainable hiking and responsible outdoor tourism, the European Ramblers Association (ERA) focuses on the following factors as overall goals and key points:

1. Environmental sustainability:

– Protection of sensitive ecosystems, including flora and fauna.

– Minimization of trail erosion through proper design and maintenance.

– Implementation of waste management practices, including waste reduction, recycling, and responsible disposal.

– Integration of renewable energy sources and sustainable infrastructure where applicable.

2. Cultural and heritage preservation:

– Respect for cultural heritage sites and indigenous communities.

– Promotion of local traditions, customs, and cultural exchange.

– Collaboration with local communities to ensure their participation and benefit from outdoor tourism activities.

– Incorporation of interpretation and educational resources highlighting the cultural and historical significance of the area.

3. Safety and Accessibility:

– Clear and informative signage throughout the trail network.

– Adequate maintenance and regular inspections to ensure trail safety.

– Inclusion of accessibility features to accommodate a diverse range of hikers, including people with disabilities or limited mobility.

– Availability of emergency response protocols and information.

4. Responsible visitor behavior:

– Education and communication on Leave No Trace principles and responsible outdoor ethics.

– Encouragement of sustainable practices, such as packing out waste, minimizing noise pollution, and respecting wildlife.

– Promotion of responsible camping, including designated campsites and fire safety guidelines.

– Encouragement of ethical wildlife interactions, such as maintaining distance and not feeding animals.

5. Community engagement and economic impact:

– Collaboration with local communities to ensure their involvement in trail planning, management, and benefits sharing.

– Promotion of local businesses, accommodations, and services that align with sustainability principles.

– Encouragement of hikers to support local economies by purchasing local products and services.

– Development of programs that contribute to the socio-economic development and well-being of local communities.

The system developed by ERA involves a rating or labeling system that indicates the level of adherence to these criteria for each trail. Trails that meet a predefined set of standards could be awarded a certification or label from ERA, indicating their commitment to sustainable hiking and responsible outdoor tourism. The process may involve self-assessment by trail managers, site inspections by ERA representatives, and periodic evaluations to ensure ongoing compliance.

The system will later also include provisions for ongoing monitoring, feedback, and continuous improvement. ERA collaborates with its member organizations, experts in sustainability, and relevant stakeholders to develop the certification criteria, implementation guidelines, and evaluation mechanisms for the system.

By establishing such a system, ERA will provide hikers with reliable information about trails that prioritize sustainability, encourage responsible outdoor behavior, and support the conservation of natural and cultural resources. The system would contribute to raising awareness, guiding hiker choices, and promoting the adoption of sustainable practices in outdoor tourism across Europe.

Rating system

Level 0: A set of guidelines for trail managers based on the criteria and subcriteria below.
These guidelines are designed to help trail managers implement sustainable actions without necessarily seeking certification as a Green Trail. Find the guidelines here.

Level 1: Green Trail Starter

– Trails that meet basic sustainability criteria and have made initial efforts towards responsible outdoor tourism practices.

– Entry-level certification indicating a trail’s commitment to sustainability but with room for improvement.

Level 2: Green Trail Intermediate

– Trails that demonstrate a higher level of sustainability and responsible outdoor tourism practices.

– Consideration of environmental, cultural, safety, visitor behavior, and community engagement criteria.

Level 3: Green Trail Advanced

– Trails that meet comprehensive sustainability standards and actively promote responsible outdoor tourism.

– Exemplary adherence to environmental, cultural, safety, visitor behavior, and community engagement criteria.

– Demonstrated innovation and leadership in sustainable practices.

Level 4: Green Trail Excellence

– Trails that achieve exceptional sustainability performance and serve as role models for responsible outdoor tourism.

– Outstanding environmental stewardship, cultural preservation, safety measures, visitor education, and positive community impacts.

– Recognition for continuous improvement and best practices.

The rating system can be visualized through a combination of symbols or labels, such as leaves or stars, corresponding to the respective levels. This enables hikers to quickly identify and differentiate trails based on their sustainability commitment.

To maintain credibility and transparency, ERA outlines the specific criteria and requirements for each rating level further down this page. This allows trail managers and hikers to understand the expectations and work towards achieving higher levels of certification.

ERA’s system will later include a process for periodic reassessment and renewal to ensure ongoing compliance and improvement. This will involve regular evaluations, feedback loops, and collaboration with trail managers, local communities, and environmental experts.

Implementing such a rating system provides hikers with a clear and standardized way to assess the sustainability and responsible practices of hiking trails. It incentivizes trail managers to continuously strive for higher levels of sustainability, leading to positive environmental and socio-cultural impacts in outdoor tourism.

This page is in the DRAFT version and is intended to be used for testing the criteria and sub-criteria in real life during 2024 and 2025.

In total, there are more than 15 sub-criteria for each level. Not all of these sub-criteria are relevant to the areas or regions in which they are used. Therefore, the trail management team must determine which sub-criteria are valid and should be used for their trail. They must also explain why the other sub-criteria are not used or are not applicable. At least half of the sub-criteria must be selected from the total to be tested or evaluated for a trail to be considered a Green Trail.

Detailed assessment criteria

Here are detailed assessment criteria and subcriteria for each level of the Green Trail Rating System:

Level 1, Beginner

Environmental Sustainability

1.1 Adherence to basic trail maintenance and erosion control measures

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular trail inspections to identify and address erosion issues.
Evidence: Inspection logs with dates and findings.
Measurable Indicator: Number of inspections conducted per month; percentage of identified erosion issues addressed within a specified timeframe.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of erosion control measures, such as water bars and drainage systems, in high-risk areas.
Evidence: Maintenance records and photographic documentation of installed erosion control features.
Measurable Indicator: Number of erosion control features installed; percentage of high-risk areas treated with erosion control measures.

1.2 Minimal impact on sensitive ecosystems and wildlife habitats

Sub-Criteria 1: Identification and mapping of sensitive ecosystems and wildlife habitats along the trail.
Evidence: GIS maps and documentation of sensitive areas.
Measurable Indicator: Number of sensitive areas identified and mapped; percentage of the trail covered by these maps.
Sub-Criteria 2: Establishment of buffer zones or restricted access areas around sensitive ecosystems.
Evidence: Signage and boundary markers; records of visitor access restrictions.
Measurable Indicator: Number of buffer zones established; compliance rate with restricted access guidelines.

Cultural and heritage preservation

2.1 Respect for cultural sites, heritage, and indigenous communities

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of protective barriers or signage around cultural sites to prevent damage.
Evidence: Documentation of installed barriers or signage; photographic evidence.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural sites with protective measures; reduction in reported incidents of damage or vandalism.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular consultations with indigenous communities regarding the preservation of cultural sites.
Evidence: Meeting minutes and attendance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of consultations held annually; percentage of community recommendations implemented.

2.2 Integration of educational materials highlighting local history and traditions

Sub-Criteria 1: Development and distribution of pamphlets, signs, or digital content focused on local history and traditions.
Evidence: Copies of educational materials; distribution logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of materials distributed; visitor engagement metrics, such as survey responses.
Sub-Criteria 2: Installation of interpretive signs at key points along the trail that highlight cultural and historical significance.
Evidence: Inventory of interpretive signs and their locations.
Measurable Indicator: Number of interpretive signs installed; visitor feedback on the quality and usefulness of the information.

Safety and accessibility

3.1 Well-marked trails with clear signage and safety information

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of directional and safety signage at key junctions and trailheads.
Evidence: Signage inventory and placement records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of signs installed per kilometer of trail; visitor feedback on the clarity and visibility of signs.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular updates to signage to reflect current trail conditions and safety information.
Evidence: Maintenance logs detailing sign updates.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of signage updates; number of outdated signs replaced within a year.

3.2 Regular maintenance to ensure trail conditions and safety measures

Sub-Criteria 1: Scheduled maintenance activities to address trail wear, such as clearing debris and repairing trail surfaces.
Evidence: Maintenance schedules and completion records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of maintenance activities conducted on schedule; percentage of the trail assessed as safe during inspections.
Sub-Criteria 2: Prompt identification and mitigation of safety hazards, such as fallen trees or washouts.
Evidence: Incident reports and response logs.
Measurable Indicator: Average response time to address safety hazards; reduction in reported safety incidents.

3.3 Consideration of accessibility features, such as accessible trail sections and facilities

Sub-Criteria 1: Assessment and documentation of trail sections for accessibility, focusing on surface conditions and gradients.
Evidence: Accessibility assessment reports.
Measurable Indicator: Length of trail sections assessed as accessible; percentage of trail sections meeting accessibility standards.
Sub-Criteria 2: Provision and maintenance of accessible facilities such as restrooms and parking areas.
Evidence: Facility maintenance records and accessibility certification.
Measurable Indicator: Number of accessible facilities available; visitor feedback on accessibility.

Responsible visitor behavior

4.1 Education and communication on Leave No Trace principles

Sub-Criteria 1: Distribution of Leave No Trace educational materials at trailheads and visitor centers.
Evidence: Copies of materials and distribution records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of materials distributed; visitor awareness levels as measured by surveys.
Sub-Criteria 2: Conducting regular workshops or informational sessions on Leave No Trace principles.
Evidence: Workshop schedules and attendance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of workshops held; participant feedback and knowledge retention.

4.2 Promotion of responsible camping practices, including designated campsites and Fire Safety guidelines

Sub-Criteria 1: Clear designation and marking of campsites, along with signage on responsible camping practices.
Evidence: Maps showing designated campsites and corresponding signage.
Measurable Indicator: Number of designated campsites; compliance rates with camping guidelines.
Sub-Criteria 2: Provision of fire safety information, including fire bans and proper fire pit usage.
Evidence: Fire safety brochures, signage, and incident reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of fire-related incidents; visitor compliance with fire safety guidelines.

4.3 Respect for wildlife and adherence to guidelines on wildlife viewing and interaction

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of informational signs at key points to guide respectful wildlife interaction.
Evidence: Signage inventory and placement documentation.
Measurable Indicator: Number of wildlife interaction signs installed; visitor adherence to guidelines.
Sub-Criteria 2: Monitoring and reporting of visitor interactions with wildlife to assess compliance with guidelines.
Evidence: Observation logs and incident reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of reported wildlife interaction incidents; percentage of interactions compliant with guidelines.

Community engagement and economic impact

5.1 Collaboration with local communities in trail planning and management

Sub-Criteria 1: Holding regular community meetings to discuss trail planning and management decisions.
Evidence: Meeting agendas, minutes, and attendance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of meetings held per year; percentage of community suggestions incorporated into planning.
Sub-Criteria 2: Establishment of partnerships with local organizations for joint trail management activities.
Evidence: Partnership agreements and activity reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of active partnerships; joint initiatives undertaken.

5.2 Promotion of local businesses and services that align with sustainability principles

Sub-Criteria 1: Promotion of local, sustainable businesses through trail-related events and marketing materials.
Evidence: Event flyers, promotional materials, and participation records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of businesses promoted; visitor engagement with promoted businesses.
Sub-Criteria 2: Collaboration with local businesses to offer eco-friendly products and services to trail visitors.
Evidence: Partnership agreements and product/service lists.
Measurable Indicator: Number of eco-friendly products/services offered; visitor satisfaction ratings.

5.3 Consideration of community benefits and opportunities for local employment or involvement

Sub-Criteria 1: Creation of volunteer opportunities for local residents in trail maintenance and visitor services.
Evidence: Volunteer program records and participant logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of volunteers recruited; volunteer hours contributed.
Sub-Criteria 2: Employment of local residents in trail-related jobs, such as guides or maintenance staff.
Evidence: Employment records and job descriptions.
Measurable Indicator: Number of local residents employed; percentage of trail workforce from the local community.

Level 2: Intermediate

Environmental sustainability

1.1 Implementation of erosion control measures

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of trail stabilization structures such as retaining walls, check dams, or reinforced trail surfaces in erosion-prone areas.
Evidence: Documentation and photographs of installed structures; engineering reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of stabilization structures installed; reduction in erosion incidents as reported in trail inspections.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of water management systems, such as drainage ditches or culverts, to prevent water-related erosion.
Evidence: Maintenance records and infrastructure maps showing water management installations.
Measurable Indicator: Number of water management features installed; percentage of trail areas protected from water erosion.

1.2 Monitoring of flora and fauna populations and protection of sensitive areas

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular biodiversity surveys to monitor flora and fauna populations along the trail.
Evidence: Survey reports, species lists, and monitoring data.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of biodiversity surveys conducted; number of species monitored.
Sub-Criteria 2: Designation and enforcement of protected areas for sensitive species or habitats identified during monitoring.
Evidence: Maps of designated protected areas, signage, and enforcement logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of protected areas established; compliance rate with access restrictions in these areas.

1.3 Integration of renewable energy sources and sustainable infrastructure

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of renewable energy systems, such as solar panels for trail lighting or visitor centers.
Evidence: Installation records, energy output data, and equipment maintenance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of renewable energy systems installed; percentage of energy needs met by renewable sources.
Sub-Criteria 2: Construction of sustainable infrastructure, such as eco-friendly restrooms or water refill stations, along the trail.
Evidence: Infrastructure plans, construction records, and sustainability certifications.
Measurable Indicator: Number of sustainable infrastructure projects completed; visitor satisfaction ratings for these facilities.

Cultural and heritage preservation

2.1 Active involvement of local communities in trail development and interpretation

Sub-Criteria 1: Inclusion of local community representatives in trail development planning committees.
Evidence: Committee meeting minutes, participant lists, and planning documents.
Measurable Indicator: Number of community representatives involved; percentage of community-driven proposals adopted in trail development.
Sub-Criteria 2: Collaboration with local artisans and cultural experts to create interpretive materials and exhibits along the trail.
Evidence: Contracts or agreements with local experts, photographs of exhibits, and interpretive material inventories.
Measurable Indicator: Number of locally produced interpretive materials or exhibits; visitor engagement with these resources.

2.2 Collaboration with local cultural organizations to enhance visitor understanding

Sub-Criteria 1: Partnerships with local museums, historical societies, or cultural groups to provide visitor education programs.
Evidence: Partnership agreements, program schedules, and attendance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of collaborative educational programs offered; participant feedback on the effectiveness of these programs.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of joint events or festivals with cultural organizations to celebrate local heritage.
Evidence: Event flyers, partnership documents, and attendance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of joint events held annually; visitor and community satisfaction ratings.

2.3 Integration of cultural heritage conservation efforts along the trail

Sub-Criteria 1: Identification and preservation of historical or culturally significant sites along the trail, including restoration projects if needed.
Evidence: Site preservation plans, before-and-after photos, and restoration reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural sites preserved or restored; reduction in degradation of identified sites.
Sub-Criteria 2: Inclusion of cultural heritage topics in trail signage, guided tours, and educational materials.
Evidence: Documentation of signage and educational materials, tour guides’ scripts, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural heritage topics included; visitor engagement and learning outcomes.

Safety and accessibility

3.1 Regular trail inspections and maintenance to ensure optimal safety conditions

Sub-Criteria 1: Monthly safety inspections to identify and address potential hazards such as fallen trees, slippery surfaces, or unstable sections.
Evidence: Inspection logs with detailed findings and corrective actions.
Measurable Indicator: Number of safety inspections conducted per month; percentage of identified hazards resolved within a specific timeframe.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of a hazard reporting system where visitors can report safety concerns.
Evidence: Reports submitted through the system, resolution logs, and follow-up actions.
Measurable Indicator: Number of visitor-reported hazards; response time and resolution rate of reported issues.

3.2 Provision of Up-to-Date trail information and emergency response protocols

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular updates to trail maps and signage to reflect current trail conditions, including temporary closures and alternative routes.
Evidence: Updated trail maps, records of signage changes, and visitor notifications.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of trail information updates; visitor feedback on the accuracy of provided information.
Sub-Criteria 2: Establishment and communication of emergency response protocols, including contact information for local emergency services and location of first-aid stations.
Evidence: Emergency protocol documentation, signage, and training records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of emergency response drills conducted; visitor awareness of emergency protocols as measured by surveys.

3.3 Consideration of diverse user Needs, including signage in multiple languages and facilities for people with disabilities

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of multilingual signage at key trail locations to accommodate non-native speakers.
Evidence: Inventory of multilingual signs and their placement.
Measurable Indicator: Number of languages represented in trail signage; visitor satisfaction among non-native speakers.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of accessible trail sections and facilities that meet the needs of visitors with disabilities.
Evidence: Accessibility assessment reports, construction records, and certification documents.
Measurable Indicator: Length of accessible trail sections; number of accessible facilities available; feedback from visitors with disabilities.

Responsible visitor behavior

4.1 Prominence of educational materials on responsible outdoor behavior and sustainable practices

Sub-Criteria 1: Distribution of educational brochures, posters, and digital content that emphasize responsible outdoor behavior, such as Leave No Trace principles.
Evidence: Copies of educational materials, distribution logs, and digital engagement metrics.
Measurable Indicator: Number of educational materials distributed; visitor awareness levels as assessed by surveys.
Sub-Criteria 2: Installation of prominent signage at trailheads and along the trail that communicates key sustainable practices.
Evidence: Photographic documentation of installed signs, visitor feedback on signage effectiveness.
Measurable Indicator: Number of signs installed; visitor compliance with promoted practices.

4.2 Encouragement of minimal waste generation, including Pack-In, Pack-Out policies

Sub-Criteria 1: Implementation of a pack-in, pack-out policy, supported by signage and visitor education programs.
Evidence: Signage inventory, visitor guidelines, and educational session records.
Measurable Indicator: Visitor compliance with pack-in, pack-out policies as observed by staff; reduction in litter reported on trails.
Sub-Criteria 2: Provision of minimal waste facilities such as recycling stations and composting bins at key trail locations.
Evidence: Facility installation records, waste collection logs, and recycling rates.
Measurable Indicator: Amount of waste diverted from landfills; visitor participation in waste reduction efforts.

4.3 Promotion of responsible wildlife encounters

Sub-Criteria 1: Development and dissemination of guidelines on maintaining safe distances from wildlife and avoiding disturbance.
Evidence: Copies of guidelines, distribution records, and visitor engagement metrics.
Measurable Indicator: Number of guidelines distributed; visitor adherence to wildlife encounter protocols.
Sub-Criteria 2: Training for staff and volunteers on how to educate visitors about responsible wildlife interactions.
Evidence: Training session records, attendance logs, and staff feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of staff trained; increase in visitor compliance with wildlife interaction guidelines.

Community engagement and economic impact

5.1 Active engagement with local communities, seeking their input and addressing concerns

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular community forums to gather input and address concerns related to trail management.
Evidence: Forum agendas, attendance records, and meeting minutes.
Measurable Indicator: Number of forums held annually; percentage of community concerns addressed.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of a community feedback mechanism, such as surveys or suggestion boxes, to continuously gather input from local residents.
Evidence: Feedback collected, analysis reports, and action plans.
Measurable Indicator: Number of feedback submissions; rate of implementation of community suggestions.

5.2 Consideration of community development initiatives and benefits-sharing arrangements

Sub-Criteria 1: Collaboration with local governments and organizations to support community development initiatives related to trail tourism.
Evidence: Partnership agreements, project plans, and progress reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of community development projects supported; measurable outcomes of these projects (e.g., job creation, infrastructure improvements).
Sub-Criteria 2: Establishment of benefits-sharing arrangements where a portion of trail-related revenue is reinvested into local community projects.
Evidence: Financial agreements, records of revenue distribution, and documentation of funded projects.
Measurable Indicator: Percentage of trail-related revenue shared with the community; number of community projects funded through these arrangements.

5.3 Collaboration with local stakeholders to promote cultural events and tourism experiences

Sub-Criteria 1: Partnership with local businesses, cultural organizations, and tourism boards to promote and host cultural events along the trail.
Evidence: Event partnership agreements, promotional materials, and attendance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural events hosted annually; visitor attendance and satisfaction ratings for these events.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of tourism packages or experiences that highlight local culture, traditions, and sustainable practices, in collaboration with local stakeholders.
Evidence: Tourism package details, partnership documents, and marketing materials.
Measurable Indicator: Number of tourism packages developed; visitor participation rates and feedback on these experiences.

Level 3: Advanced

Environmental sustainability

1.1 Integration of advanced sustainability practices

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of renewable energy systems such as solar panels or wind turbines to power trail facilities.
Evidence: Installation records, energy output data, and equipment maintenance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Percentage of trail facilities powered by renewable energy; reduction in carbon emissions attributed to trail operations.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of water conservation measures, including rainwater harvesting systems and low-flow fixtures at trail facilities.
Evidence: System installation records, water usage logs, and maintenance schedules.
Measurable Indicator: Volume of water conserved annually; percentage reduction in water usage compared to baseline data.

1.2 Biodiversity enhancement initiatives

Sub-Criteria 1: Habitat restoration projects, including reforestation, wetland restoration, or removal of invasive species.
Evidence: Project plans, before-and-after photographs, and restoration progress reports.
Measurable Indicator: Area of habitat restored; number of native species reintroduced or population increase in target species.
Sub-Criteria 2: Reintroduction of native species to restored habitats, supported by ongoing monitoring and management.
Evidence: Species reintroduction plans, monitoring data, and collaboration agreements with conservation organizations.
Measurable Indicator: Number of species reintroduced; survival and reproduction rates of reintroduced species.

1.3 Monitoring and reporting on environmental indicators

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular monitoring of key environmental indicators such as air and water quality, soil health, and biodiversity.
Evidence: Monitoring protocols, data collection logs, and analysis reports.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of environmental monitoring activities; trends in environmental indicators over time.
Sub-Criteria 2: Publication of annual environmental performance reports to guide continuous improvement and transparency.
Evidence: Published reports, dissemination records, and stakeholder feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of reports published annually; stakeholder engagement with report findings.

Cultural and heritage preservation

2.1 Development of interpretive materials and interactive experiences

Sub-Criteria 1: Creation of interactive experiences such as augmented reality tours or mobile apps that celebrate local culture and heritage.
Evidence: App development records, user analytics, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of interactive experiences developed; visitor engagement and satisfaction rates.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of detailed interpretive materials, including brochures, guides, and educational exhibits along the trail.
Evidence: Copies of interpretive materials, distribution logs, and exhibit documentation.
Measurable Indicator: Number of materials distributed; visitor feedback on the educational value of materials.

2.2 Collaboration with local artists and artisans

Sub-Criteria 1: Incorporation of public art installations or cultural elements created by local artists along the trail.
Evidence: Contracts or agreements with artists, photographs of installations, and maintenance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of art installations along the trail; visitor engagement and feedback on cultural elements.
Sub-Criteria 2: Hosting art and craft workshops or events featuring local artisans as part of the trail experience.
Evidence: Event flyers, participant logs, and workshop materials.
Measurable Indicator: Number of workshops/events held; participant satisfaction and cultural knowledge gained.

2.3 Engaging local communities in cultural exchange programs

Sub-Criteria 1: Development and facilitation of cultural exchange programs that involve storytelling, traditional practices, and community-led tours.
Evidence: Program schedules, participant lists, and feedback forms.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural exchange programs conducted; participant feedback on cultural enrichment.
Sub-Criteria 2: Involvement of local elders or cultural leaders in storytelling initiatives to share local heritage with visitors.
Evidence: Documentation of storytelling sessions, video/audio recordings, and participant feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of storytelling sessions conducted; visitor engagement and cultural appreciation ratings.

Safety and accessibility

3.1 Regular safety trainings and certifications for trail personnel

Sub-Criteria 1: Mandatory safety training programs for all trail personnel, including first aid and emergency response certifications.
Evidence: Training attendance records, certification documents, and training program materials.
Measurable Indicator: Percentage of staff certified in safety protocols; frequency of safety drills conducted.
Sub-Criteria 2: Advanced safety training for key personnel on specialized topics such as wilderness first aid or search and rescue operations.
Evidence: Training schedules, certification logs, and participant feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of staff trained in advanced safety topics; effectiveness of training as evaluated through simulated exercises.

3.2 Provision of accessible facilities and amenities throughout the trail network

Sub-Criteria 1: Expansion of accessible trail sections and installation of amenities such as wheelchair ramps, accessible restrooms, and braille signage.
Evidence: Construction records, accessibility assessments, and facility maintenance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of accessible trail kilometers added; visitor feedback from individuals with disabilities.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular audits and updates to ensure all facilities meet or exceed accessibility standards.
Evidence: Audit reports, action plans, and records of facility upgrades.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of accessibility audits; percentage of facilities compliant with updated standards.

3.3 Implementation of advanced safety technologies

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of emergency communication systems along the trail, such as call boxes or satellite communication devices.
Evidence: Installation records, system maintenance logs, and usage data.
Measurable Indicator: Number of emergency communication devices installed; response times to emergencies reported via these systems.
Sub-Criteria 2: Deployment of automated alerts and monitoring systems to detect and warn of hazards, such as weather changes or wildlife activity.
Evidence: System deployment records, alert logs, and response protocols.
Measurable Indicator: Number of automated alerts issued; reduction in safety incidents following alerts.

Responsible visitor behavior

4.1 Integration of interactive educational tools and multimedia platforms

Sub-Criteria 1: Development of mobile apps or interactive kiosks that educate visitors on responsible outdoor behavior through games, quizzes, and multimedia content.
Evidence: App development records, user engagement data, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of interactive tools available; visitor engagement rates and knowledge retention as assessed through follow-up surveys.
Sub-Criteria 2: Installation of multimedia platforms along the trail that feature videos, animations, or virtual guides promoting sustainable practices.
Evidence: Multimedia installation documentation, content creation records, and visitor usage analytics.
Measurable Indicator: Number of multimedia platforms installed; visitor interaction and behavior changes following exposure to the content.

4.2 Encouragement of active participation in conservation and restoration activities

Sub-Criteria 1: Organization of volunteer events where visitors can participate in conservation activities, such as tree planting or trail clean-ups.
Evidence: Event flyers, participation logs, and project reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of conservation events held; number of volunteers participating and areas restored.
Sub-Criteria 2: Promotion of citizen science initiatives where visitors can contribute to environmental monitoring efforts, such as wildlife surveys or plant identification.
Evidence: Citizen science project records, data collection logs, and participant feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of citizen science initiatives conducted; quantity and quality of data collected by visitors.

4.3 Advocacy for responsible tourism beyond the trail

Sub-Criteria 1: Collaboration with local businesses and transportation providers to promote sustainable travel options, such as bike rentals or shuttle services.
Evidence: Partnership agreements, promotional materials, and service usage data.
Measurable Indicator: Number of sustainable transportation options promoted; percentage of visitors utilizing these services.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of educational campaigns that encourage visitors to engage with local communities and support responsible tourism practices beyond the trail.
Evidence: Campaign materials, distribution logs, and impact assessments.
Measurable Indicator: Reach and effectiveness of educational campaigns; changes in visitor behavior as reported by local businesses.

Community engagement and economic impact

5.1 Implementation of community-led projects

Sub-Criteria 1: Support for community-led initiatives that focus on socio-economic benefits, such as creating local jobs or developing eco-friendly products.
Evidence: Project plans, community agreements, and progress reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of community-led projects supported; measurable socio-economic outcomes (e.g., jobs created, revenue generated).
Sub-Criteria 2: Facilitation of cultural revitalization projects that preserve or promote traditional practices and crafts.
Evidence: Project documentation, participant logs, and outcomes reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of cultural projects facilitated; level of community participation and cultural impact.

5.2 Monitoring and evaluation of community impacts

Sub-Criteria 1: Regular surveys and focus groups with community members to assess the social and economic impacts of the trail.
Evidence: Survey results, focus group transcripts, and analysis reports.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of community impact assessments; percentage of community members reporting positive impacts.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of indicators and benchmarks to track the effectiveness of community engagement and economic benefits generated by the trail.
Evidence: Indicator development documents, data collection protocols, and annual reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of indicators and benchmarks established; progress towards achieving target outcomes as measured by these indicators.

5.3 Partnerships with local organizations to develop community-based tourism initiatives

Sub-Criteria 1: Collaboration with local tourism boards, cultural organizations, and businesses to create community-based tourism experiences that highlight local culture and sustainable practices.
Evidence: Partnership agreements, tourism product development records, and marketing materials.
Measurable Indicator: Number of community-based tourism initiatives developed; visitor participation rates and satisfaction with these experiences.
Sub-Criteria 2: Support for training programs that build local capacity in tourism management, guiding, and sustainable business practices.
Evidence: Training program curricula, attendance records, and participant feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of training sessions conducted; number of local participants who complete training and apply skills in tourism-related roles.

Level 4: Excellence

Environmental sustainability

1.1 Demonstration of exceptional sustainability practices

Sub-Criteria 1: Achievement of industry certifications or awards for sustainability, such as LEED or ISO 14001.
Evidence: Certification documents, award records, and assessment reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of certifications or awards received; compliance score with industry standards.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development and dissemination of case studies showcasing the trail’s sustainability practices as a model for others.
Evidence: Published case studies, distribution records, and feedback from industry peers.
Measurable Indicator: Number of case studies published; citations or references in industry literature.

1.2 Incorporation of innovative technologies and practices

Sub-Criteria 1: Integration of cutting-edge technologies, such as energy-efficient lighting, renewable energy microgrids, or smart waste management systems.
Evidence: Installation records, technology performance data, and maintenance logs.
Measurable Indicator: Reduction in energy usage, waste generation, or carbon footprint as a result of the technology implementation.
Sub-Criteria 2: Pilot projects testing new sustainability practices, such as carbon sequestration initiatives or advanced water recycling systems.
Evidence: Project proposals, implementation reports, and environmental impact assessments.
Measurable Indicator: Success rates of pilot projects; scalability and adoption by other trails or organizations.

1.3 Integration of long-term monitoring and research programs

Sub-Criteria 1: Establishment of long-term environmental monitoring programs that track key indicators such as biodiversity, climate impact, and ecosystem health.
Evidence: Monitoring protocols, data collection logs, and annual reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of indicators monitored; long-term trends in environmental health metrics.
Sub-Criteria 2: Collaboration with research institutions to conduct studies on the impact of trail management practices on local ecosystems.
Evidence: Research agreements, published papers, and research data.
Measurable Indicator: Number of research projects conducted; impact of findings on trail management practices.

Cultural and heritage preservation

2.1 Recognition as a Flagship Trail for cultural heritage conservation

Sub-Criteria 1: Designation as a UNESCO World Heritage Site or inclusion in a national register of culturally significant sites.
Evidence: Application documents, designation certificates, and official recognition records.
Measurable Indicator: Status of recognition; impact on visitor numbers and cultural preservation efforts.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular hosting of high-profile cultural events or festivals that highlight the trail’s significance in cultural heritage.
Evidence: Event schedules, promotional materials, and attendance records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of high-profile events hosted; visitor engagement and media coverage.

2.2 Development of interactive educational experiences

Sub-Criteria 1: Creation of interactive installations or digital platforms that allow visitors to engage with cultural heritage through immersive experiences, such as virtual reality or augmented reality tours.
Evidence: Installation plans, platform usage data, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of interactive experiences available; visitor engagement metrics and satisfaction rates.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of hands-on workshops or participatory programs where visitors contribute to cultural preservation activities, such as restoration work or oral history projects.
Evidence: Workshop documentation, participant logs, and project outcomes.
Measurable Indicator: Number of workshops held; participant contributions to preservation efforts.

2.3 Collaboration with academic institutions and cultural organizations

Sub-Criteria 1: Partnership with universities and cultural organizations to conduct in-depth research on the trail’s cultural and historical significance.
Evidence: Research agreements, published studies, and collaborative project records.
Measurable Indicator: Number of research projects completed; academic citations and public dissemination of findings.
Sub-Criteria 2: Joint development of educational programs and interpretive materials that are used both on the trail and in academic settings.
Evidence: Program materials, distribution logs, and educational usage data.
Measurable Indicator: Number of joint programs developed; educational reach and impact.

Safety and accessibility

3.1 Implementation of cutting-edge safety measures and technologies

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of advanced safety systems, such as real-time hazard detection, GPS tracking for emergency response, and automated weather alert systems.
Evidence: System installation records, operational logs, and safety reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of advanced safety systems installed; reduction in safety incidents and emergency response times.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular updates and upgrades to safety infrastructure, ensuring the trail meets or exceeds the latest safety standards.
Evidence: Upgrade plans, maintenance logs, and safety audits.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of safety updates; compliance with safety standards and regulations.

3.2 Active Involvement in trail safety research and Best Practices sharing

Sub-Criteria 1: Participation in or leadership of trail safety research initiatives, including collaborative studies and safety innovation projects.
Evidence: Research participation records, published papers, and project outcomes.
Measurable Indicator: Number of research projects led or participated in; impact on industry safety practices.
Sub-Criteria 2: Organization of workshops, seminars, or conferences to share best practices in trail safety with other organizations.
Evidence: Event schedules, attendee lists, and presentation materials.
Measurable Indicator: Number of safety-related events organized; attendee feedback and adoption of shared practices.

3.3 Integration of advanced accessibility features

Sub-Criteria 1: Installation of state-of-the-art accessibility features such as adaptive trail surfaces, guided pathways for visually impaired visitors, and multi-sensory interpretive stations.
Evidence: Construction records, accessibility assessments, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of advanced accessibility features implemented; visitor satisfaction among users with disabilities.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular consultation with disability advocacy groups to ensure that the trail not only meets but exceeds accessibility standards.
Evidence: Consultation meeting minutes, action plans, and compliance reports.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of consultations; percentage of recommendations implemented.

Responsible visitor behavior

4.1 Recognition as a leader in responsible outdoor behavior

Sub-Criteria 1: Achievement of awards or certifications for excellence in promoting responsible outdoor behavior, such as Leave No Trace certifications or eco-labels.
Evidence: Award certificates, certification records, and assessment reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of awards/certifications received; compliance with responsible behavior standards.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of a visitor recognition program that rewards responsible behavior, such as a “Green Visitor” badge or public acknowledgment.
Evidence: Program guidelines, recognition records, and visitor feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Number of visitors recognized; impact on overall visitor behavior.

4.2 Active participation in regional or national responsible tourism campaigns

Sub-Criteria 1: Collaboration with regional or national organizations to participate in or lead responsible tourism campaigns, focusing on sustainability and ethical travel.
Evidence: Campaign participation records, promotional materials, and campaign impact reports.
Measurable Indicator: Number of campaigns participated in; reach and effectiveness of campaigns.
Sub-Criteria 2: Development of educational materials that are distributed beyond the trail, contributing to broader responsible tourism efforts.
Evidence: Copies of educational materials, distribution logs, and feedback from recipients.
Measurable Indicator: Number of materials distributed; impact on visitor behavior and broader community engagement.

4.3 Implementation of visitor feedback mechanisms

Sub-Criteria 1: Establishment of comprehensive feedback systems, including surveys, suggestion boxes, and digital platforms, to gather visitor input on responsible behavior initiatives.
Evidence: Feedback system documentation, survey results, and suggestion logs.
Measurable Indicator: Number of feedback submissions received; percentage of feedback used to make improvements.
Sub-Criteria 2: Regular analysis of visitor feedback to identify trends and areas for improvement in promoting responsible outdoor behavior.
Evidence: Feedback analysis reports, action plans, and follow-up assessments.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of feedback analysis; number of improvements implemented based on visitor input.

Community engagement and economic impact

5.1 Considered a Model Trail for positive community impacts

Sub-Criteria 1: Publication of impact studies and reports that demonstrate the trail’s positive effects on local communities, including economic, social, and environmental benefits.
Evidence: Published reports, distribution records, and media coverage.
Measurable Indicator: Number of impact studies published; measured improvements in community well-being indicators.
Sub-Criteria 2: Hosting of site visits and workshops to share the trail’s successful community engagement and economic development strategies with other trail managers and stakeholders.
Evidence: Event schedules, participant lists, and presentation materials.
Measurable Indicator: Number of site visits/workshops hosted; participant feedback and implementation of shared strategies by others.

5.2 Active involvement of local communities in trail management

Sub-Criteria 1: Establishment of a community advisory board that plays a key role in decision-making processes for trail management.
Evidence: Advisory board meeting minutes, decision logs, and community feedback.
Measurable Indicator: Frequency of advisory board meetings; percentage of decisions influenced by the advisory board’s recommendations.
Sub-Criteria 2: Implementation of participatory planning processes that actively involve local residents in shaping the future development and management of the trail.
Evidence: Records of community planning sessions, participant feedback, and action plans.
Measurable Indicator: Number of community members involved in planning processes; level of satisfaction with their involvement and the outcomes.

5.3 Facilitation of local enterprise development

Sub-Criteria 1: Support for local entrepreneurs in developing trail-related businesses, such as guiding services, craft markets, or eco-friendly accommodations.
Evidence: Business support program documents, training records, and enterprise success stories.
Measurable Indicator: Number of local enterprises supported; growth in revenue or employment within these enterprises.
Sub-Criteria 2: Provision of resources and infrastructure, such as business incubators or micro-financing, to foster economic resilience among local communities.
Evidence: Resource allocation records, infrastructure development reports, and enterprise outcomes.
Measurable Indicator: Number of enterprises benefiting from support programs; sustainability and growth metrics of supported businesses.

These detailed assessment criteria and sub-criteria provide a framework for evaluating trails and ensuring compliance with sustainability and responsible tourism practices. Regular evaluations, on-site inspections, and stakeholder feedback will be incorporated into the certification process to maintain credibility and encourage continuous improvement.

Scoring system

Here’s a suggestion for a scoring system that can be used for each criterion on each level of the Green Trail Rating System:

Level 1: Green Trail Starter

For each criterion, a score from 1 to 3 can be assigned:

– 1: Basic compliance with minimal requirements.

– 2: Moderate compliance, with some efforts towards sustainability and responsible practices.

– 3: Good compliance, demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices, but with room for improvement.

Level 2: Green Trail Intermediate

For each criterion, a score from 1 to 5 can be assigned:

– 1: Basic compliance with minimal requirements.

– 2: Moderate compliance, with some efforts towards sustainability and responsible practices.

– 3: Good compliance, demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices.

– 4: Very good compliance, exceeding basic requirements and making notable progress.

– 5: Excellent compliance, showcasing exemplary efforts and best practices.

Level 3: Green Trail Advanced

For each criterion, a score from 1 to 7 can be assigned:

– 1: Basic compliance with minimal requirements.

– 2: Moderate compliance, with some efforts towards sustainability and responsible practices.

– 3: Good compliance, demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices.

– 4: Very good compliance, exceeding basic requirements and making notable progress.

– 5: Excellent compliance, showcasing exemplary efforts and best practices.

– 6: Exceptional compliance, demonstrating innovation and leadership in sustainability.

– 7: Outstanding compliance, setting industry benchmarks and serving as a role model.

Level 4: Green Trail Excellence

For each criterion, a score from 1 to 10 can be assigned:

– 1: Basic compliance with minimal requirements.

– 2: Moderate compliance, with some efforts towards sustainability and responsible practices.

– 3: Good compliance, demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices.

– 4: Very good compliance, exceeding basic requirements and making notable progress.

– 5: Excellent compliance, showcasing exemplary efforts and best practices.

– 6: Exceptional compliance, demonstrating innovation and leadership in sustainability.

– 7: Outstanding compliance, setting industry benchmarks and serving as a role model.

– 8-10: Exceptional compliance, reflecting continuous improvement, innovation, and excellence.

These scores are assigned based on an evaluation of the trail’s performance against each specific criterion. The total score for each level can be calculated by summing up the scores for each criterion within that level.

To achieve a certain level, trails need to meet a minimum total score threshold for that level. For example, to achieve Level 3, a trail may need to score an average of 4 or higher across all criteria within that level.

The scoring system provides a quantifiable means of assessing the trail’s compliance with sustainability and responsible tourism practices. It allows for objective evaluation and comparison, supporting transparency and accountability in the certification process.

ERA Green Trails Initiative